Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Document a workaround for deploying PowerMax + Replication on two-cluster system #1337

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
Merged

Document a workaround for deploying PowerMax + Replication on two-cluster system #1337

merged 40 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024
+22 −12

Conversation

jooseppi-luna
Copy link
Contributor

@jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna commented Oct 29, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Description

Currently, when PowerMax is deployed with Replication via the operator, the reverseproxy service is not deployed on the target cluster. This PR documents this gap and the workaround for it.

GitHub Issues

GitHub Issue #
dell/csm#1429

Checklist:

  • Have you run a grammar and spell checks against your submission?
  • Have you tested the changes locally?
  • Have you tested whether the hyperlinks are working properly?
  • Did you add the examples wherever applicable?
  • Have you added high-resolution images?

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 29, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Test Results

77 tests  ±0   77 ✅ ±0   3s ⏱️ ±0s
 3 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0dfe946. ± Comparison against base commit 4e1732b.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

AronAtDell
AronAtDell approved these changes Oct 29, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@AronAtDell AronAtDell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

sharmilarama
sharmilarama approved these changes Oct 29, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@sharmilarama sharmilarama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

anandrajak1
anandrajak1 reviewed Oct 29, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@anandrajak1 anandrajak1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add this for previous version.

@jooseppi-luna jooseppi-luna merged commit 3e02001 into main Oct 30, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anandrajak1 anandrajak1 anandrajak1 left review comments

@AronAtDell AronAtDell AronAtDell approved these changes

@sharmilarama sharmilarama sharmilarama approved these changes

@gallacher gallacher Awaiting requested review from gallacher gallacher is a code owner

@mjsdell mjsdell Awaiting requested review from mjsdell mjsdell is a code owner

@prablr79 prablr79 Awaiting requested review from prablr79 prablr79 is a code owner

@rajkumar-palani rajkumar-palani Awaiting requested review from rajkumar-palani rajkumar-palani is a code owner

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@jooseppi-luna @AronAtDell @sharmilarama @anandrajak1