Fixings for windows (Update thread_priority.cpp #170)

[SENAI-GilmarCorreia]

Hello ROS Developers,

After the last update provided by #175 and #170, the new includes were not available to windows. As I'm working on this on windows I provided a quick fix to solve this problem.

I really don't like my proposed solution, but we can considered as a hot fix for windows users.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.36%. Comparing base (11af426) to head (6daa6a7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #179   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.36%   75.36%           
=======================================
  Files           8        8           
  Lines         341      341           
  Branches       62       62           
=======================================
  Hits          257      257           
  Misses         50       50           
  Partials       34       34           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	75.36% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/thread_priority.cpp	11.42% <100.00%> (ø)

[christophfroehlich]

Sorry for breaking this. Are you familiar with windows CI pipelines and want to contribute one?

[SENAI-GilmarCorreia]

Sorry for breaking this. Are you familiar with windows CI pipelines and want to contribute one?

I have some few knowledge about CI on Windows, although I don't have extensive experience in this area. However, I’m eager to contribute!

This isn't my main account; you can find me more actively participating under @GilmarCorreia . I'm currently working on creating a CI to compile all ROS desktop components on Windows with Python 3.10 to ensure compatibility with IsaacSim as well.

[saikishor]

This mightn't work as when you link against it, it will complain about missing reference to the method lock_memory defined in the .hpp

Could you take a look at #180 and let us know what you think?

[saikishor]

@SENAI-GilmarCorreia does this entry bother you?

realtime_tools/package.xml

Line 24 in 11af426

<build_depend>libcap-dev</build_depend>

[SENAI-GilmarCorreia]

@saikishor, I don’t have any issues with this dependency.

[saikishor]

@saikishor, I don’t have any issues with this dependency.

Thank you for clarifying

[christophfroehlich]

closing in favor of #180 ?